ITV fury over Take Me Out scandals

ITV
Take Me Out logo
The Take Me Out fallout continues. Following unsavoury headlines in which two contestants were previously escorts in the sex business, ITV is said to be furious.
The commercial broadcaster is apparently insistent that Talkback Thames, the independent production company that makes Take Me Out, utilise more rigorous selection processes in the future.
According to the Daily Mirror, ITV bosses deem the appearance of convicted criminals and ex-prostitutes on the show as "unacceptable".
Last week, over 5 million viewers saw contestant Aaron Withers win a date with Wen-Jing Mo on the popular show hosted by Paddy McGuinness.
According to the Daily Mirror, ITV will edit out footage of Wen and Aaron's date in Cyprus - previously scheduled to air this Saturday - after it emerged he had worked as a £50-an-hour male escort. In addition, the 32-year-old, originally from Frome in Somerset, pleaded guilty to an assault charge on a young woman last year.
However, the Daily Mirror also reported a further controversy; 28-year-old Wen-Jing Mo was a £200 per hour hooker.
This isn't the first time controversy has hit a TV show based on a contestant's past. In 2011, TV bosses were embarrassed when it emerged that Nathan Hageman, the first winner of Simon Cowell's £1 million game show Red Or Black?, had a violent past.
TV bosses then axed three more contestants after finding "inconsistencies" during a background check and promised to bring in tighter checks on criminal convictions.
But Aaron Withers slipped through the net and Wen-Jing Mo didn't reveal details about her past because, she said, she wanted to find romance on the show.

ITV
Take Me Out's Wen-Jing Mo
Speaking exclusively to the Daily Mirror, Wen stated: "I would definitely not have slept with him if I'd known he had punched a woman." She added that he'd made a fool of her.
An ITV spokesman said: "We have asked talkbackThames to carry out an immediate review of their procedures on this show."
A senior executive at ITV is quoted as saying: "This whole incident has been extremely embarrassing."
A talkbackThames spokeswoman said: "During the application process we ask contestants to declare any convictions, and background checks are carried out on each individual, in line with industry practice. Aaron's criminal record did not come to light. We will be reviewing procedures going forward."
I had the misfortune to tune and watch this piece of rubbish last night...where do all these silly shrieking girls come from?...oh of course from any housing estate, high street, shopping mall etc etc...what a lot of empty headed, vacuous, not particularly pretty totty...and the men are not much better..the UK just descends ever more quickly with junk like this on the TV...and where the hell did they ever dig this slimeball Mc Guiness from? I remember he himself got fixed up with some glamour puss last year...guess with the vast sums of money these people earn from the TV companies they are shacked up in some 15 room bedroom mansion, with a couple of porsches in the garage....with stuff like this on the TV, my recommendation is emigrate.....
@Becki Gresham. You're totally missing the fact that these two people lied to get on the show. It's not the hooker that bothers me at all. Like you said, it's up to them as it's their lives. Thing is, how many of those men would have refused to go out with her because of that? And the bloke....well, anyone who its their partner is a dispicable excuse of a human being, whether they're male or female. How many would want to go out with him if they knew the truth? I sure wouldn't.
@Carl Cooper By the sounds of it, your criminal record is very different to these two's pasts. How would you feel if, say, your sister went out with someone who was known to have beaten his previous partner? Someone like you, I would applaud.
Mr. Jogga Singh Teidy says...
Ex convicts are to be excluded indefinitely from ALL public life? Relevant to their conviction, yes.
As for sex issue mentioned here, what is the difference between serial dates and having sexual intercourse and the prostitutes described?
Serial dating is just sliver away from prostition surely. except in prostitution the parties have streamlined the process.
The fact it attracts the contestants complained of, shows only very sexually experienced have the gaul to go on what is deemded to be a respectible activity, called dating, and normally can mean to be playing the field...having sexual intercourse, then acting all coy for the next liason!
So given this cultural stance on opposite sex relationship which is everywhere generally open or closed, then I don't know what the TV bosses are complaining about? IT IS THE NORM!
AS FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, MANY CONVICTION ARE A MATTER OF POLICY TO CONVICT?! AND ARE FALSE.
EVEN IF TRUE, DOES THIS MEAN MEN AND WOMEN ARE BARRED BY GOVERNMENT FROM FORMING ANY FUTURE RELATIONSHIPS?
THE SPOKES WOMAN IS ER..DAFT?
I INVITE THE TV FOLKS TO FIND HOLES IN MY ARGUMENTS HERE!
OF COURSE IT IS A MATTER OF ABUSE AND DISCRIMINATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE TV COMPANY HERE TO BARR THOSE WHO HAVE SERVED THEIR SENTANCE OR HAVE SEVERED DIFFICULT DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIPS, IN WHICH VIOLENCE MAY OR MAY NOT BE TRUE!
THE WOMAN CONTESTANT HERE HAD SEX? IF SO, THEN HOW IS THAT DIFFERENT TO A PROSTITUTE HAVING SEX AND MOVING ONTO THE NEXT PERSON? SEXUAL EXCHANGE WITHOUT COMMITMENT HAS HAPPENED, IS THAT NOT SAME AS PROSTITION?
Of course I am being a devil's advocate here!














