Celebrity Big Brother continues on Channel 5. What have the housemates been up to?
Eurovision 2013: How bad are the UK's songs?
Bucks Fizz, Eurovision Song Contest winners. Image. Rex
Who remembers Bucks Fizz winning Eurovision back in 1981? Those were the days. But what about now? Is the UK unfairly treated by the voting public of Eurovision?
Is Britain hampered by simply having better taste than our European cousins? Or is it possible - just possible - that we actually perform badly because our songs just aren't that good?
Well, there's a fairly simple way to test whether the UK's Eurovision entries are unfairly overlooked by a European public who care more about regional politics than quality songs: look at whether or not the British public thought the songs were good enough to bother buying them.
If you do that over the past 15 years (since phone voting was introduced to Eurovision), there's quite a clear pattern that emerges: the UK's performance in Eurovision does seem to track the songs performance in the UK charts.
Rather than being treated unfairly by the Eurovision voters, we seem to broadly agree with them - when Europe thinks a song is an improvement on last year's, more of us also buy it.
And when we don't bother shelling out our hard-earned money for the track, the people of Europe can't be bothered to vote for it either.
It's worth noting that in the past 15 years, we've never had a Eurovision entry that made it higher than number 5 in the UK charts (Scooch in 2007 had that distinction), while poor Josh Dubovie in 2010 only limped into the chart at 179.
Sweden's winner last year, by contrast, was a huge number one hit all across Europe, and reached number 3 in the UK.
The lesson's fairly clear - the UK doesn't really get a raw deal in Eurovision. If we want to do better with Europe's voters, a good start is entering a song we all like.
latest tv videos
Neighbours will not be welcoming Charlene Robinson back to Ramsay Street for the 30th anniversary as Kylie Minogue has said the rumours of her return are untrue.
Date 10 hrs ago, Duration 0:34, Views 87